Independent DeFi security desk · Status: operationalMethodology & corrections · Submit an incident
DeFi Safety · Fact checked

Hyperliquid confirms Singapore base, but MAS says it is not the regulator

Hyperliquid's unregulated status in Singapore highlights the challenges and risks in the evolving decentralized finance landscape.

This article may contain affiliate links. Commercial relationships are disclosed in the affiliate policy.

DeFi Safety — illustration keyed to this article's identifier. Source documents are listed under Sources and are not reproduced here.

What happened

Hyperliquid’s unregulated status in Singapore highlights the challenges and risks in the evolving decentralized finance landscape.

Reported details

  • Hyperliquid’s unregulated status in Singapore highlights the challenges and risks in the evolving decentralized finance landscape.
  • The FT reports that people familiar with MAS’s thinking consider the decentralized venue outside its jurisdiction. Singapore’s rules distinguish crypto derivatives on approved exchanges from those offered elsewhere.

Why this matters

Hyperliquid sits on the regulatory side rather than the structural side: the useful question is which dated rule, if any, follows this notice, and who wrote it. A rule that is not published yet changes nothing about who may act today, so treat the pending text as pending rather than as settled.

Evidence boundary

The scope is limited to what the linked reports state, and where two of them diverge both positions are recorded without either being picked in advance.

What to verify

Before acting on Hyperliquid, read the dated rule text itself rather than a summary of it, and note which agency wrote it and whether the comment period is still open.

Sources and editorial check time

This information is educational and is not financial, legal, or tax advice.

Sources